Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 58,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 5:16 pm
A few weeks ago, Bob Lawless called the Supreme Court’s decision in Schwab v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:28 pm
REDUCED to Hindering Prosecution – Possession of Marijuana for Sale, State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:17 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 2:05 pm
Codifying the Michigan Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Rouch World v MI Department of Civil Rights, which held that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation constitutes a violation of ELCRA as currently written, the amendment makes Michigan the 24th state to incorporate provisions for safeguarding individuals based on sexual orientation. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 4:05 am
The full decision in Ebrahimian v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:00 am
And, further, since her causes of action weren’t “duplicative,” and had been pleaded with sufficient particularity, the AD2 didn’t think they were subject to dismissal on that basis, either.Seems like they were all pretty discriminating there.# # #G.S. v Pitts Mgt. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 10:05 am
In McLeod v. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 7:08 am
The complaint (full text) in Poe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 3:39 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 9:35 am
The court also declines to dismiss her claim under a restitution statute, which relied on a state law hacking violation. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:30 pm
CAAF granted review today in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:04 pm
(See Barlow v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 11:30 pm
Pamela Chestek, at her Property, Intangible blog, reports (here) that the Joyce Theater Foundation had filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:31 am
Supreme Courts decision in Herring v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:26 pm
In a case captioned Ludwigsen v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 8:52 pm
Cheryl Stein has a nice op-ed in the Washington Times regarding Herring v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which come within… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which come within… [read post]
