Search for: "High v State" Results 6501 - 6520 of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The most high profile media law case of the year, Depp v News Group Newspapers, began before Nicol J on Tuesday 7 July 2020. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Specifically, Syed argued that the State failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence (a fax cover sheet disclaiming the reliability of the cell phone records), which violated the State’s duty imposed by Brady v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:47 am by Rosalind English
Mohammed Othman v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 28 May 2012 – read judgment This was a further application for bail to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) after the appellant had failed in his application to the Grand Chamber of the Strasbourg Court earlier this month, but had launched an appeal to be heard by SIAC, against the Home Secretary’s refusal to revoke his deportation order. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:57 am by Donald Clarke
On Oct. 6, 2022, the European Court of Human Rights issued a decision, Liu v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 3:21 am by CMS
Therefore, the decision of the High Court that the purpose of the May dividend was to put assets beyond the reach of the creditor was upheld. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm by Dale Carpenter
Were it a final decision on the merits rather than a decision on an interlocutory appeal, Pidgeon would be good candidate for the kind of slap-down summary reversal the Supreme Court dealt the Arkansas high court last Monday in Pavan v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:09 am by Beverley Rogers
A recent New York Times editorial post stated that Congress is considering overturning a court ruling about age discrimination (Gross v. [read post]
  Therefore, the law invited the high standard of “strict scrutiny” by the court because, according to the US Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Dec 2012, 12:57 pm by Kedar S. Bhatia
United States was filed with assistance from the ACLU. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 3:44 am by INFORRM
The Court first reiterated that Article 10 protects ‘expressive conduct’, including expressive conduct which offends, shocks or disturbs the State or ‘any section of the population’. [read post]