Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 15,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2018, 9:51 am
We had a spirited debate about fee agreements, as it seems the Rules and their interpretation continuously change. [read post]
26 May 2018, 9:51 am
We had a spirited debate about fee agreements, as it seems the Rules and their interpretation continuously change. [read post]
26 May 2018, 1:00 am
We explore that and the death of the DOL “fiduciary” rule. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm
However, the 2010 Supreme Court ruling Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:26 am
But in this case, the lender was a bona fide hard money equity investor, and as such could legally bargain for a control over bankruptcy to protect its investment. [read post]
25 May 2018, 5:00 am
Follow the rules of evidence and legal procedures that govern how and what you are legally allowed to present for the court’s review. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:40 pm
Another good article in the new National Consumer Law Center series of pieces written to help non-lawyers understand consumer legal issues better. [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm
Unfortunately, the rule was repealed last October under the Congressional Review Act. [read post]
24 May 2018, 12:22 pm
Avenatti's motion is likely more performative than legal, more public relations strategy than sincere legal tactic. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:00 am
It should be a fit standard to be used in all legal proceedings wherein proof of the reliability of records, and therefore the reliability of the record systems from which they are obtained, is required. [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:00 am
Missing (or almost missing) an exit means continuing on to the next safe exit. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:57 am
So if you’re not a social network, mobile app, driverless car, or one of the big data companies, does this mean you can breathe a sigh of relief? [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:26 am
Dane Lloyd: Would you say that you’re paying for copyright? [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:16 am
” “Changing positions is a really big deal,” she continued, “and people should hesitate a long time over it,” because the role of the office is “seeing the long-term interests of the United States” and the “credibility of the office depends on judges believing that’s what you’re doing. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:18 am
If you're a fan of the Notorious RBG, the dissent is a must-read. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:11 am
The rule expressly covers speech engaged in while “participating in bar association, business or social activities in connection with the practice of law,” and would thus cover Continuing Legal Education panels, political discussions over dinner at bar functions, and so on. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:04 pm
This was done in an activity "in connection with the practice of law"—Continuing Legal Education events are certainly connected with the practice of law. [read post]
21 May 2018, 7:18 am
Not only are the facts behind the underlying interference claim still classified, but so is Judge Spath’s ruling apparently finding no “good cause” to justify the lawyers’ resignations, which is the legal analysis at the heart of this latest controversy. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:57 am
Investment Facilitation UNCITRAL will continue its deliberations. [read post]
20 May 2018, 6:31 pm
Continue reading → [read post]
