Search for: "Judge v. United States" Results 6501 - 6520 of 35,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2020, 5:20 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The invocation of the notwithstanding clause meant any harm was not necessarily protected, and the judge noted there was no fine or penalty stated in the Act. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm by Orin Kerr
See Jacobsen, 466 U.S. at 125-26 (holding that permanent destruction of small portion of property for testing a de minimis intrusion on possessory interest); United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am by charonqc
“The following seven paragraphs have been redacted [It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer. v)  It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
LEXIS 64335 (SD CA, May 1, 2008), a California federal district judge accepted the recommendations of a federal magistrate judge set out in a lengthy opinion at Lewis v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm by Ken White
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
” The President appoints “Officers” who are those who exercise “significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
I was checking the newly released opinions from the United States Supreme Court and Taylor v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Gore and find that Wisconsin’s recall procedures violate the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:46 pm
After pleading guilty to several counts of healthcare fraud, theft and money laundering, the defendant in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:49 am by Florian Mueller
On September 11, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will conduct a hearing on the Apple v. [read post]