Search for: "Label v Label" Results 6501 - 6520 of 13,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Nevertheless, Neurim argued that in addition to damages for patented (on label and off label) uses it was in principle able to recover damages for non-patented (and also therefore off label) uses. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:02 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court referred to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in PepsiCo Inc v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic, C-281/10, which found that it is certainly permissible to use physical products in order to "confirm the conclusions already drawn" from the designs. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
  There was no document describing the use of pregabalin for the treatment of pain.In the USA, gabapentin had been widely used off-label for the treatment of pain (and indeed in July 1996 – the same time as the patent’s priority date – the US Food and Drug Administration complained about Parke-Davis promoting this off label use, eventually resulting in a $430 million fine). [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:00 am by Beck/Herrmann
So we got a big kick out of Pustejovsky v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:27 pm by Chris Green
However, the dilution of esteem when a label is expanded was obvious to the Court in its Mishawaka Manufacturing v. [read post]