Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 36,309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2017, 9:10 am
9thCir.: functionality b/c of psychological and health benefits (claimed). [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:33 am
C. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Now, §1447(c) expressly provides:If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm
Schroeder, William C. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
Register No. 156 at page 46709 (August 14, 2006).Where there is a dispute when the child turns three years old and is transitioning from Part C to Part B, the public agency is not required to continue Part C services: if the child is found eligible and there is parental consent, the public agency must provide the services that are not in dispute as stay put. 34 CFR Section 300.518(c); 71 Fed. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 1:20 pm
The CJEU first reminds of its judgment in Kronhofer (C-168/02), where it had ruled out the domicile of the investor as such as the place of financial damage. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 7:18 pm
C. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 5:37 pm
The combination of reputation and popularity in selecting news that matters B. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 7:54 am
" The First holds that it doesn't really matter, because even though C&M is arguing that an error in the part of the case of which the First lacks jurisdiction, while we will not disturb (for jurisdictional reasons) the district court's judgment holding that the bond was an unconditional guarantee by AIICO, we can review the correctness of that ruling as a defense to C&M's liability under the indemnity agreement if… [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm
It is pretty rare that the United States Supreme Court weighs in on family law matters. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Rev. 127 (1999) Taylor C. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:30 am
This is the second in a series of postings on a multi-faceted corporate dissolution battle waged in Nassau County Supreme Court called Matter of Marciano (Champion Motor Group, Inc.) involving three partners and a luxury automobile dealership.Part I of the series (read it here) summarized the basic facts and discussed the defendants’ initial challenge to the plaintiff Marciano’s standing to seek dissolution. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
IN THE MATTER OF K.A.N., J.B. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:10 pm
Orbitz Worldwide, LLC, ESX-C-142-09 (N.J. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am
Documents are an “out of court statement to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:33 pm
The author of this blog is Douglas C. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
§§ 702.413-414(c). [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:57 pm
We've been pretty quiet about Madoff on this blog, so I think it's time for a few words on the matter. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 6:03 am
"A Rule 26(c) protective order, no matter how broad its reach, provides no guarantee that compelled testimony will not somehow find its way into the government's hands for use in a subsequent criminal prosecution. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:15 am
Michael Mitchell and John C. [read post]
