Search for: "Mark Case" Results 6501 - 6520 of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2019, 8:36 am by Bill Marler
When the case concluded, Marler figured he would return to a general personal injury practice, possibly specializing in medical malpractice. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:10 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court acted on two petitions from Missouri rapist and triple murderer Mark Christeson. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 12:00 am
Said the Board, "Everything depends on the specimens, which, in this case, show the use of two discrete marks. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:00 pm
"The Board found this case analogous to In re Sloppy Joe's Int'l, 43 USPQ2d 1350 (TTAB 1997). [read post]
More important, the cases reflected a marked increase in the number and proportion of actions against registered investment advisers and broker-dealers, and their associated persons. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jocelyn Bosse
 Anna Maria Stein analysed the recent EUIPO decision to refuse to register a position trade mark for footwear. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:00 pm
Attorney Mark Blane discusses CA Vehicle Code Section 21200 which governs bicyclists. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:01 am by R. David Donoghue
Eve denied defendant Hunter Fan's motion to dismiss plaintiff's false patent marking case. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:45 pm
And so, the Board concluded that Section 10 was not violated.In any case, the Board found that A.V. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:12 pm by Greg Lambert
And I think for what it’s advertised it, it hits the marks on there. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:18 am by John L. Welch
KG, Serial No. 76690276 (July 7, 2011) [not precedential].Brief too long: Applicant's appeal brief comprised 45 pages (including table of content, table of cases, description of the record, statement of the issue, statement of facts, and argument), which exceeded the limit of Rule 2.142(b) by 20 pages. [read post]
Trump bearing classification markings [list of classification markings]. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:46 am
 This case concerns the interpretation of Article 3(1)(e) of Directive 2008/95 relating to trade marks, relating specifically to shape trade marks and what the IPO describes as "copyright in a high chair for children" [though the keen reader will be hard-pressed to find any mention of the word 'copyright' in the questions referred]. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 4:30 pm
And if you know who within the Commission is the individual whose job it is to deal with this matter, please tell the IPKat so that he can urgently contact him in person in order to press the professions' case. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 2:17 pm
On the contrary, a national trade mark registration, or few more in the relevant markets of reference are, in most cases, more than enough for an average SME whose output does not and will likely never justify a market horizon wider than that. [read post]