Search for: "Mark Cover" Results 6501 - 6520 of 18,206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
We're only talking about trade marks ... [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:32 am by Brendon Tavelli
For Skid-e-kids, the FTC’s settlement means taking remedial measures such as destroying all of the information collected from children in violation of the COPPA Rule, providing links to online educational material, and retaining an online privacy professional or joining an approved COPPA safe harbor program to oversee applicable COPPA-covered websites; an injunction against future violations of COPPA and misrepresentations about the collection of children’s information; and a… [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
As a result, covered institutions must "provide equal athletic opportunity for members of both sexes. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:00 am by David M. Benenfeld
PIP covers all medical costs after a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:33 pm by zola.support.team
  Key Takeaways This bill marks a significant change in New York employment law; however, certain aspects remain unclear and may lead to litigation and challenges. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:08 am by Rob Robinson
Urgent Call for Action Mark Greisiger, President of NetDiligence, provided crucial commentary on the study’s findings. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:41 pm by Harry Surden
 It has implications on the sensibility of extending existing legal doctrines to cover the activities of artificial agents. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Once a Notice of Covered Action is posted by the SEC, individuals have 90 calendar days to apply for an award. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 10:42 am by Steven Hansen
Covered ProductsSection 103(a) applies only to children’s products and their packaging. [read post]
Smith J accepted Lidl’s arguments that consumers recognise the Lidl Marks as indicating Lidl’s goodwill, which included its reputation as a discounter, offering goods at low prices but stopped short of widening this to cover an unspecified “quality” or “standard” of goods. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:30 am by Steve Baird
® means the owner actually has federally-registered the designation as a trademark or a service mark (I suppose it also could mean the designation is registered as a certification mark or collective mark, but those are few and far between) for the goods or services covered by the symbol’s use — for more details on the proper use of the ® notice symbol, check my post from a few years back: Registration Symbol Misuse As Trademark Fraud? [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:28 am by davidsontm
  Domain Name Renewal As with trademarks, domain name registrations cover a fixed period of time and will eventually “die” if you fail to renew them. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 3:55 pm
The cover story, by talented Allen & Overy triumvirate Nicola Dagg, Philip Mansfield and Mark Ridgeway, is all about the interplay between patent law (which creates monopolies), competition law (which neuters them, if you're unlucky) and technical standards (which force monopolies open by decreeing them essential for everyone to use). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:55 am by John W. McGlynn
Registration Nos. 2,674,112; 2,988,402 and 3,088,995 for CABO PRIMO & Design, LOS CABOS & Design and CABO CLASSICS, all covering food items such as “burritos, enchiladas, tacos” and other Mexican style food products. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:00 am by Georgina Hey (AU)
This is a good idea in principle, but as all trade mark owners know, their rights in their registered mark only extend to the goods and services covered by their registration (or similar goods and services), and so this could simply function as an unnecessary deterrent to new business entrants. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:49 am by Wes Anderson
What’s truly interesting from a trademark counsel standpoint is that, while Facebook filed these oppositions, they only cover seven of Designbook’s applications. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:25 am
"Judge Walsh found this approach to be a logical extension of Universal Overall to cover both use-based applications and ITU applications, as long as correction is made prior to registration or any challenge to the pending application.TTABlog comment: The Universal Overall case is not one in which an applicant listed five goods but had actually used the mark on less than five. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:30 am
I suspect that the advertising/marketing folks who brought us this promotion were not consciously attempting to cover both of these alternative bases for the commercial role played by trade marks. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:08 am by Bettina Clefsen (b/cl IP)
In trademark law, on the one hand the principle of territoriality of IP rights could prohibit an interpretation of the term which would also cover possessing the products in Spain (where the German mark is not protected). [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 4:44 am
Protection in Germany of some of those trade marks was refused in 1973, 1992 and 1993. [read post]