Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6501 - 6520
of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
Yesterday the Court announced that it had granted review in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
(internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
” First Impressions, the Michigan Law Review’s online forum, is hosting a symposium to mark the tenth anniversary of the Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:18 am
The case, Marks v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
To balance the scales, I’m going to give a belated snap to the prosecutors in State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Linford: do we think of certain types of marks as innovative? [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:48 am
A quick lunch time post to let our readers know that the European Court of Justice's (CJ) decision in the German AdWord referral in "Eis.de GmbH v BBY Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH", in short: "Eis.de" (case C-91/09) has now been published. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:11 pm
This case is Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:45 am
State Farm (Fed. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm
Supreme Court began hearing arguments Wednesday in Golan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:33 pm
” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:14 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews Iancu v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case involving mandatory deportation, TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
The mark scheme stated that such a claim could not be considered inventive because one of the prior art documents (D2) disclosed fuses with glass layers that were inherently configured to soften and flow. [read post]
