Search for: "People v Word" Results 6501 - 6520 of 17,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2011, 6:46 am by Paul Horwitz
Mark's post below about the Parents Involved case and the argument over the meaning of Brown v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:09 pm
It's been a few days since Geoffrey Hobbs QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, handed down his decision in Whirlpool v Kenwood. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:53 am
 One such case is EMI (IP) Ltd and others v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and another [2012] EWHC 1644 (Ch), a Patents Court (England and Wales) decision of John Baldwin QC which dates back to last month -- 25 June, to be precise. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 1:54 pm by Bill Otis
 The first and third of these are, as I understand it, the principal arguments in the district court's opinion in Jones v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:08 am by Ira Meislik
” First, we’ll look a court opinion about the “words” used in a notice of exercise. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:54 am by Susan Brenner
The court explained that the word “destructive” “is broad. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:13 am
Therefore, people who insist on making people declare their pronouns, are rude by trying to force society to their will. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
Being averse to change, they attend patent law events in the hope of receiving comfort from speakers who say things like "while the substance of the law is changing, things will remain much the same in practice" -- words that one rarely hears in patent conferences at this juncture.Finally there are the people who enjoy networking. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
But the premise of the cases that authorize such discipline (such as Tinker v. [read post]