Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 8:08 am
The core of the ITC’s jurisdiction is in rem, meaning that its jurisdiction isn’t over people, but rather, the articles themselves. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:02 am
In NFIB v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
Finding willing buyers, not gov’t or powerful patrons = independence, allowing development of ideas freely and perfection of craft, flourishing culture. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
The court described this as an “exercise of regulatory zeal” (Rosemond v Kentucky Board, 1), and while it found that the speech was neither commercial nor professional, it would in any case be excessive for the Board to restrict on the grounds that the power of the Board is not unlimited. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:30 pm
Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:30 pm
Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:30 pm
Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
” County of Sacramento v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
We owe a duty to the people of this state to exercise the judicial power, see Tex. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 12:12 pm
What we find is that there are very few people that are all good or all bad. [read post]
21 May 2008, 4:36 am
Lane (where the Court affirmed Congress' power to guarantee people with disabilities access to court proceedings). [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Even in the follow-up order in Wheaton College v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:46 pm
That lawsuit, Jewel v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Some applied to too few people. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 8:54 am
But the Court has the power to deal with it. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
Benson, Jones v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm
Kappos, Mayo v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 8:01 am
"[E]vidence of some instances of actual confusion can serve as a powerful demonstration that many more people are likely to be confused. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:22 am
About the author: Ted Brooks' noteworthy trial experience includes People v. [read post]
