Search for: "STEVENS v. THE STATE"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 7,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2009, 9:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:26 pm
Justice Stevens filed a dissenting opinion. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 1:47 pm
MacHutta, involved an association formed in July of 1979, by Steven MacHutta (yes, that MacHutta). [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:55 pm
In the background is a further factor: In May 2001, when the Court passed up a chance to review the issue in a case from a Texas state court (Bridger v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 4:08 am
"By contrast, Justice Stevens in his dissent states that there are concerns with CBA's providing for enforcement of statutory rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:58 am
Let me first state the obvious: As a liberal constitutional law professor, I believe that the Department of Justice has done the "right thing" by seeking to overturn former Senator Ted Stevens' conviction for corruption charges. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:56 pm
…and you’ll get something like today’s opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
Richman pointed us to a federal statute called the Hyde Amendment, which, according to this 2005 Second Circuit opinion in a case called U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 12:38 pm
MacHutta, involved an association formed in July of 1979, by Steven MacHutta (yes, that MacHutta). [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:48 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:20 am
United States, a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suit the couple filed three years ago in the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:54 am
Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:45 am
The Supreme Court has just handed down its decision in 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
Although the ruling in Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:21 am
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority in Harbison v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
" Here is the full text: In connection with the post-trial litigation in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
" Here is the full text: In connection with the post-trial litigation in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
"The high court disagreed, reversing the appeals court's decision.Federal law "authorizes federally appointed counsel to represent their clients in state clemency proceedings and entitles them to compensation for that representation," said Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the court.Justice Antonin Scalia dissented, saying the applicable statute "is most naturally and coherently read to provide federally funded counsel to capital… [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:31 am
The decision below, which held for the state, is reversed in a 7-2 opinion by Justice Stevens, available here. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:31 am
The decision below, which held for the state, is reversed in a 7-2 opinion by Justice Stevens, available here. [read post]
