Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 28,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2017, 7:41 am
In 1976, in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:50 am
Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:06 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 9/23/09Cite: Bires v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:02 am
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINAIn The Court of AppealsRobert Guinan, Appellant, v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:08 am
§ 42.108(c) states that “a genuine issue of material fact created by such testimonial evidence will be viewed in the light most favorable to the petitioner solely for purposes of deciding whether to institute [a] review. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Examining Diageo Brands BV v Simiramida-04 EOOD [2015] C-681/13) James drew attention to the CJEU’s strict approach to countries refusing to enforce judgments from another Member State on the grounds of public policy. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am
As might have been expected in the circumstances, the decisions shine the light of principle on this contested and difficult area of law. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
The latest federal case to be filed is PETA et al v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:01 pm
People v Backus, decided today, is one of those short Court of Appeals decisions which seem innocuous, but cryptic, until you read the decision below. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
This case is on appeal from the district court's resentencing of Joseph Story in light of United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rita v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> State of Veracruz v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:22 pm
United States case challenging the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:52 am
In Rat Pack v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:04 pm
To us, the decision seemed contrary to the rule stated in Branick. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
This morning, I attended the Supreme Court arguments in the cell phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 9:17 am
Rachael Hanna recapped last week’s proceedings in the United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Code § 2254(d) establishes the following as the standard court must apply in habeas cases:An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim —(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal… [read post]
