Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 13,252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2014, 2:01 pm
” As we have previously covered, in Freeman, et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 8:15 pm
” VENDOR’S LIENS Hancock Bank v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:00 pm
“ As we have previously covered, in Freeman, et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:26 pm
The Monomeles Protodikeio: an insider's viewLast December the IPKat reported on Case C-535/13 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi SA, a request by a Greek court, the Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon, for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:14 pm
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:28 am
In Toyota Motor Credit v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:09 am
The state high court found that the trial court erroneously limited its analysis of joint employment status to the four factors outlined in the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Bonnette v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:35 pm
That case, Rothe Development Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 2:51 pm
The case, Tatum v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 11:47 am
Last week the LLC Law Monitor blog by Doug Batey of Stoel Rives commented on a Massacusetts case, Kosanovich v. 80 Worcester Street Associates, LLC, No. 201201 CV 001748, 2014 WL 2565959 (Mass. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
Venture Cotton Cooperative v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:47 am
Last week the LLC Law Monitor blog by Doug Batey of Stoel Rives commented on a Massacusetts case, Kosanovich v. 80 Worcester Street Associates, LLC, No. 201201 CV 001748, 2014 WL 2565959 (Mass. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:58 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 8:15 am
Since the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm
Supreme Court on behalf of We All Help Patients, Inc. in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Cambridge v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:43 am
The Court cited Article 249 EC which states that ‘a decision shall be binding in its entirety upon those to whom it is addressed’ and the case of AssiDomän Kraft Products AB v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR I-5363 (Case C-310/97). [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:51 am
Potts v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:02 am
Venable v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. [read post]