Search for: "Thomas v. State"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 15,510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am
Justice Thomas quoted me in his concurrence arguing in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:52 am
Century 21’s owners, Thomas A. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:53 am
The case known as Garland v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:23 pm
The Court is considering a plea by a group of voters and officeholders in Texas (Veasey v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
The closest one finds is the 14th Amendment, except that it only authorizes penal legislation applicable to state actors, not to private persons generally, and the offenders in this case were not state actors.The authority cited for all of these charges is the Commerce Clause, interpreted as authorizing criminal penalties under the Necessary and Proper Clause, mainly based on the Supreme Court precedent in Wickard v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:43 pm
The draft decision, which Politico published on Monday night [May 2, 2022], would overturn Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
Thomas Hutchings, an eBay fraud investigator, explained that in this type of fraud scheme a person known as a `money mule’ acts as a conduit for the transfer of the money between the buyer and the seller. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Similar to Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
While states’ rights often involved slavery and white supremacy, states’ rights and state sovereignty were also invoked to defend the rights of northern citizens to resist efforts to enforce the Fugitive Slave laws. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:46 am
Thomas, supra.) [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:55 am
Thomas H. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
The Los Angeles Times reports on the introduction by Senator Jim Webb of a new bill, the Military Service Integrity Act, in response to the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am
Thomas Feinman, dated February 23, 2010, that denied the motion. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:39 am
Justice Thomas noted that the Act states that “such bond shall be conditioned on completion of the work. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:02 pm
Pierre Seyfarth Synopsis: In deciding Spokeo v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:07 pm
"Petitioners Jason Puerto, Jeffrey Armstrong, Thomas J. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:34 am
At the Maryland Appellate Blog, Steve Klepper discusses the possibility that Justice Clarence Thomas could be questioning whether the Court’s decision in Citizens United applies to the states. [read post]
