Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 6501 - 6520 of 24,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
  Part II focuses on the new CIA guidelines and their treatment of publicly available information and related issues, including bulk collection, querying, retention and dissemination, and undisclosed participation in organizations inside the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:30 am by Richard Goldfarb
  But the allegations about testing of products relate only to McDonald's and Burger King; there is just an allegation that Friendly's "is assumed to be aware of health issues pertinent to restaurants anywhere in the United States" and and even more conclusory, "Upon information and belief, Defendants' grilled chicken products are prepared in the same manner throughout the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:45 am
It would be months still before it heard oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:00 pm by David Klein
As our readers are aware, the TCPA was signed into law in 1991 to restrict certain telephone solicitations that invade upon the privacy of United States consumers. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 5:16 pm by Danny O'Brien
ICANN stays a private company, still working out of the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Isabel McArdle
v)              Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 1:05 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California might rule anytime now. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
This will permit the district court to accept the Release in evidence and conduct the trial of this case without regard to the restraint we previously placed upon it.C.A.2 1954.Bernstein v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
In the meantime, the United States SupremeCourt took up the lethal injection issue in Baze v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 8:02 pm by JP Sarmiento
The BIA in C-V-T stated that the factors that the immigration judge must consider when deciding whether to grant cancellation of removal to a lawful permanent resident are as follows: The positive factors are: Family ties in the United States, particularly ties to lawful permanent residents or U.S. citizens; Residence of long duration in the U.S. [read post]