Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 51,424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2008, 4:33 am
Updating yesterday's ILB entry on the 7th Circuit's vote to deny rehearing of its decision in Hinrichs v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 2:05 pm
After last term, which was heavy on separation of powers and “administrative state” issues, many people are watching Consumers’ Research v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 3:48 am
FTC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 3:51 pm
People still use fax machines. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:17 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:38 pm
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 5:24 am
On March 9, 2010, the Court of Appeal published its January 2010 decision in People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:19 am
These cases include Knoeffler v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:01 am
The case was LB Enfield v Phoenix and others, High Ct, March 19, 2013, and seemed to concern the circumstances in which a possession claim can properly be issued in the High Court. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Catherine’s Milling and Lumber Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 9:52 am
The cases to be argued are: • People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
The California Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 6:13 am
See, also, e.g., Curcio v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:29 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
” Thomas v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:50 pm
" The Court explained that It is well settled that showup identifications are generally disfavored because they are inherently suggestive by nature, but they nevertheless are not "presumptively infirm" (People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541, 543; see People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533, 537). [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 1:54 pm
Maryland: Games Prosecutors Play, 57 Case W. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:29 am
In People v. [read post]