Search for: "Claimant(s)" Results 6521 - 6540 of 26,254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 5:32 am by Sean Quirk
” The report’s white paper on disputed territory in Asia cites a Defense Intelligence Agency analysis that “China primarily uses maritime law enforcement ships, with its Navy ships in protective positions, to pressure other claimants and limit access to Chinese-occupied features. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Giles Peaker
The loan was secured as a third mortgage on Mr Ss property. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 5:09 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  As the claim proceeds towards payment, the insurer’s incentive to pay the claim would increase. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:48 am by INFORRM
  For instance, AAA’s evidence stated:- “I have many friends and acquaintances who do not know what I do for a living. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
These early cases were sparse, and they generally allowed recovery only when a vessel’s owner failed to exercise due diligence to ensure that the ship left port in a seaworthy condition (…) Because a claimant had to show that he was injured by some aspect of the ship’s condition that rendered the vessel unseawor­thy, a claim could not prevail based on “the negligence of the master, or any member of the crew. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:03 am by vforberger
“Not only does this rule exceed the authority Congress allowed in MCTRA, it may violate the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:38 am
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Peter Dizdar, Claimant, v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:38 am
In today's featured FINRA customer arbitration case, we consider some of the troubling rules by which this forum operates.Case In PointIn a FINRA Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in December 2017, and as amended, Claimants as... [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:45 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
” With that statutory background in mind, the Court went on to address the issue presented here: “what is the result when a recipient of pre-suit notice fails to comply with § 29-26-121(a)(5), and then requests the dismissal of a matter based upon a claimants failure to add a necessary party that was known to the recipient of pre-suit notice and should have been identified to claimant following receipt of pre-suit notice and prior to the… [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:19 pm by Attorney Author
Claims for workers’ compensation benefits, as well as claims arising under the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act (LHWCA) and the Defense Base Act (DBA), often hinge upon determining causation between a claimants injury and the alleged work-related accident. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 8:27 am by Christopher G. Hill
  Of course, if they are an issue they can be a big one, and their terms can come back to bite a claimant that has not properly vetted them. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 6:18 am by Keegan Boyle
” The appeals court disagreed with Warby’s decision and found that there was an identifiable group who had suffered harm due to Google’s actions. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:00 pm
The right of opt-out presents interesting strategic opportunities for claimants: The claimant or counterclaimant will elect whether to recover damages or not. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:56 am by Emily Burchfield, Guest Author
Other states present similar statistics to Oklahoma’s in their own claims against commercial pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Stephen Wermiel
” The first question posed in Alito’s test, the quality of the prior court’s reasoning, essentially gives the majority a free hand to overrule. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 5:26 am
In the first place, the claimant wanted the CJEU to clarify that these provisions authorize any standing party to bring actions to annul contractual clauses with the object/effect to prevent the resale of copies of works or computer programs that were already sold with the copyright-holder’s consent. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm by Deborah Hensler
Windsor[4] explicitly recognized the procedure’s legitimacy, even while striking down a settlement between future asbestos injury claimants and a consortium of asbestos manufacturers. [read post]