Search for: "Ed"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 71,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2020, 7:58 am
“Don’t ‘Reply All’ If Client of Opposing Counsel CC’ed, Bar Says” — “Attorneys who get an email from opposing counsel with that counsel’s client cc’ed shouldn’t hit “reply all” because this likely violates professional ethics rules, the Illinois State Bar Association recently advised. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:56 am
The less you know: new push to “de-bias” faculty recruiting by removing CVs and interviews from the process [John Morgan, Times Higher Ed/Inside Higher Ed on developments in Britain] “You Can’t Make This Up: A Speech Code that Investigates Students for Discussing the Freedom of Speech” [University of South Carolina: Ilya Shapiro and Patrick Moran on Cato certiorari brief in Abbott v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:43 pm
Posted by Ed Folsom, November 28, 2023. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 7:20 am
Posted by Ed Folsom, April 12, 2022. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 12:40 pm
Posted by Ed Folsom, November 9, 2023. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
As explained in a previous post, I have decided to post a series of Special Ed Law 101 articles to give those outside the SpEd (special education) circle a better chance of understanding what we mean and to get more people hooked on this ever-growing field.Special Ed Law 101- Part IIThe Requirement of LRE (least restrictive environment)In addition to the requirement of FAPE, which was discussed in a previous post, the IDEA also requires that to the… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:16 am
The passionate supporters and opponents are legion, but I've struggled hard to find a nuanced perspective on the entire matter, until I read Pratap B Mehta's op-ed in the Express (here).I think the op-ed is spot on, and captures what may distress people - who strongly support women's rights and empowerment - about the Bill. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:27 am
There is a great post today on Inside Higher Ed on the importance, and more than occasional disregard, of deadlines in higher ed. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:30 am
, in The Work of Authorship 237-76 (Mireille van Eechoud ed. 2014). [read post]
1 May 2010, 10:13 am
FILL OUT THE FORM TO THE RIGHT, CALL ED WALLIS AT 901.275.0600 OR 901.527.2125 OR FILL OUT THE FORM BELOW TODAY FOR YOUR FREE CASE EVALUATION: CALL: (901) 527-2125 AFTER HOURS: (901) 275-0600 EMAIL: Tim or Ed by clicking here. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:21 pm
Fuerst &Hamish Stewart, The Law of Evidence in Canada, 6th ed. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:57 pm
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD1238 .S63 2013Marcus Smith & Nico Leslie, The Law of Assignment, 2d ed. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:57 am
Doernberg, International Taxation in a Nutshell, 11th ed. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:38 am
Milhaupt, eds., Regulating the Visible Hand? [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 8:06 am
I understand that you want their side to lose, but this is an op-ed about tactics. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 6:44 pm
Mendoza, ed.) (2006) raúlsalinas and the Jail Machine: My Weapon is My Pen. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 11:01 am
The ED has taken a decision immediately following the applicant’s response to the (first and only) communication of the ED and, when doing so, has ignored the discernable intention of the applicant or at least has not tried to clarify the latter (cf. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm
”Aertsen, Ivo and Brunilda Pali, eds. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 4:01 pm
Wettstein, eds. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
In the present case, however, the ED had refused to (immediately) issue a communication pursuant to R 71(3). [read post]