Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 11,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 5:35 am
English law has recognized certain instances—such as proprietary torts like trespass, breach of fiduciary duty, and “exceptional circumstances” like the infamous Blake v Attorney General case related to stripping the profits from a British-turned-Soviet spy’s autobiography—where compensation for loss may not be sufficient. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm
What was once commonplace and accepted can shift over the course of time (Plessy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:21 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
As a federal court ruled in the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:13 am
Tell that to the European Court of Justice in Case C-487/07 L'Oreal v Bellure, as criticised by the referring court here. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 5:38 am
Described in depth in Section V, it also emerges from the multi-disciplinary framework of social healing through justice Professor Yamamoto has been developing for guiding and assessing practical reconciliation initiatives. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:56 pm
For more information see: • Islam v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:31 pm
Afrikaans newspapers were closely aligned with the governing National Party, while English titles were allied to the English-speaking community. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
Also, English proficiency was not required in order to perform any of the jobs in Job Group 070. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
” Wyoming v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
While this Kat was taking part to the outstanding EIPIN congress in Alicante, he became aware of the fresh decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal in YouTube v Telecinco of 14 January 2014 [Madrid Court of Appeal decision No 11/2014, available here; non-official English translation kindly provided by the Kat-friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Madrid) available here; the IPKat's note on the first instance decision here]. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
This meant that the English courts have jurisdiction to hear the claim against the 7th Defendant.Should the joinder application be stayed pending the trade mark office's decision on validity? [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
The case of Fisher v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
On appeal, however, it was found that the mark had become distinctive, within the meaning of Article 7(3), in the German and English-speaking member states. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:33 am
Piracy doesn’t pay, or rather it does pay millions until the rights owners catch up with you and bring the full force of English law down upon you. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 5:43 am
The court found in favour of Maradona, awarding damages amounting to EUR 70,000.PatentsAnnsley Merelle Ward reported on the decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in Teva v Gilead. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
Also promoted to the Court of Appeal in the same batch of ten are Sir Geoffrey Vos (remember United Airlines v United Airways, here, Lady Gaga v Moshi Monsters, here?) [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:35 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
