Search for: "High v State"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 35,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2020, 7:27 am
In a decision that will influence how policyholders and insurers around the world address business-interruption coverage for COVID-19 losses, the English High Court recently handed down its much-anticipated judgment in the “Test Case,” The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:18 am
In any case, having an agency such as the IABS would hand states parties a tool and an opportunity to be seized by the matter without having to set up a lengthy preparatory process for consultations under BTWC Article V. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
According to the EU judges, the Commission should have proven that the profits at issue were taxable under Irish law, as interpreted by the Irish High Court8)Murphy (Inspector of Taxes) v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:41 pm
Thus, this latest round in Texas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
This was an important case, building upon some earlier cases, like United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
The preliminary injunction issued by the court took effect immediately as of the date of the ruling (September 29, 2020) and will remain in effect pending resolution of the lawsuit Immigrant Legal Resource Center, et al., v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:37 am
The Court of Appeal largely upheld the High Court’s ruling. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
Islam, 301 A.D.2d at 345, 751 N.Y.S.2d 449; Brancoveanu v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Dollinger answered in his September 18, 2020 opinion in Matthew A. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:13 pm
In discussing the best interests of the child in Young v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm
On 29 September 2020 the Press Gazette had a piece on a High Court judge, Mr Justice Williams, agreeing to bar journalists from attending a private trial due to take place in the Family Division of the High Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
As stated in Woodfall at paragraph 17.181, “In the eyes of equity, the proviso for re-entry was merely a “security” for the rent. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 10:51 am
Ginsburg’s notable Supreme Court opinions include her majority opinion in the United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:29 am
Supreme Court on Monday, Carney v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:12 pm
United StatesBarr v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:23 pm
This ban has been creating uncertainty for employers and their intra-company transferee employees, high-skilled workers, seasonal laborers, cultural exchange visitors, and dependents who have been stuck abroad since June. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:25 am
Among today's grants was BP P.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 8:33 am
In FTC v. [read post]
