Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 12,672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2009, 7:48 am
The 7-2 decision (written by Justice Stevens) may have made the change seem trivial. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:06 am
And as a matter of principle, I don’t think that the courts should go very far in forcing their opinion of what’s proper on the people they’re supposed to be serving. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm
Justice Barrett raised this point forcefully during oral argument in the ACA case, and the ultimate opinion tracked her questions about redressability. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
Whether they’re representative of the priesthood, I can’t say. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 12:55 pm
That’s my opinion, but that’s going to be your problem when they start filing Bar complaints against you. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 4:42 pm
Par conséquent, la vraisemblance du défaut d'usage s'établit de manière indirecte, fondée sur un faisceau d'indices. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 3:00 am
Amid Worry About Trump, Calls for Career Justice Dept. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:58 pm
However, it is important to note that pseudonymous data is personal data if it can be re-identified by the data controller or by third parties through combining the data with external information from other sources (Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor of 21 May 2015, subs. 11). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:42 am
“In that opinion, shocking but not shocking, that Justice Clarence Thomas said the quiet part out loud—that marriage, that right to contraception was very much at risk. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
CopyrightKat Eleonora Rosati analyses the Advocate General’s opinion in Pelham and Others, C-476/17, which was referred to the CJEU by the German Federal Court of Justice. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 10:15 am
Intervention of the court is envisaged in few circumstances only, like, in case of fraud or bias by the arbitrators, violation of natural justice, etc. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 7:53 am
What you're saying is that the department can engage in intentional discrimination to avoid concern that they will be sued under disparate impact. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
In the process, they are issuing radical, not conservative, opinions. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
A: we’re not arguing the doctrines are wrong. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm
A childish – but sinister – way of saying “You’re so wrong, I don’t even have to explain why you’re wrong. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 1:45 pm
I certainly hope there are five Justices who agree that Wisconsin (and many other contemporary states) are acting unconstitutionally. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:31 pm
Department of Justice [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:01 pm
In the past, schools have punished students for what they considered “disruptive” expressions inside school, including speech on racial justice and other social issues. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:06 pm
I'm fairly confident that's what the six justices in the majority in Spokeo would indeed hold. [read post]
