Search for: "Labelle v. State"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 8,030
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 4:00 pm
The fact that the employer labels her as an “independent contractor” or has her sign a contract stating the same will not be dispositive. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:21 am
District Judge Mary Cooper said in dismissing the suit, Edelman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court in Walling v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:53 pm
Criminal defendants in New York enjoy co-existing state and federal constitutional rights to confront their accusers. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm
Justice v. the World": After the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:47 am
Full disclosure of all of the manufacturer’s warnings, especially when the label states that safety during pregnancy, for nursing mothers, or use in children under certain ages has not been established. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:21 pm
Franklin in the first paragraph of Franklin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:29 pm
"[5] In its recent decision on punitive damages, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 10:03 pm
The boss at FSIS is Alfred V. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:29 pm
But on the narrow issue of conservative v. something else--well, kudos to Mark for trying. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:02 am
The Second Circuit waited until the American Bar Association's Intellectual Property conference and the bloom of the cherry trees to release its long-awaited decision in Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 5:34 pm
Somehow the document wound up in the court's public file.On Tuesday, California's 3rd District Court of Appeal in Wallis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:40 am
(The case is Borden-Perlman Insurance Agency v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:36 am
( R. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 1:13 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat) … [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:50 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
This didn’t please the FDA, which sent a warning letter to AMARC, stating that since Poly-MVA isn’t FDA-approved, the customer testimonials essentially falsify the product as approved.Here's the letter:HomeInspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal InvestigationsEnforcement ActionsWarning LettersEnforcement ActionsWarning Letters2012-Amarc Enterprises 12/11/12Department of Health and Human ServicesPublic Health ServiceFood and Drug AdministrationLos Angeles… [read post]
