Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 6521 - 6540 of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2018, 7:59 pm by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
The plaintiff claimed that each of the organizational defendants was vicariously liable for the driver’s negligence. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:32 am by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
Accordingly, we agree with Defendants' assertion that because Cain's tortious act on Judith occurred two years after his employment with TLC was terminated, Defendants did not owe Plaintiff a duty of care at the time of Cain's tortious act and therefore cannot be held liable on a cause of action for negligent hiring and retention. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 7:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 Though the lion’s share of alleged unlawful conduct was committed by Global, the EEOC sought to hold the Grower Defendants equally liable as joint employers of the temporary H-2A workers. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:28 pm
In this case, Askew was found liable for the injury caused by her own statement, not by any injury caused by her co-defendants. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 2:13 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
A plaintiff has to demonstrate that it was more likely than not that the damages were caused by the defendants wrongful conduct. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:31 pm
A California municipality can be held liable for personal injury or wrongful death if the city's negligence contributed to the accident in some way. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 5:06 am by SHG
No matter how silly it all sounds at the moment, and more to the point, how untenable it seems to live in a world where school marms are overseeing your social media use, what’s in it for colleges to defend your right to free speech, to challenge cries of sexual harassment, all so you can instagram a pic of your lunch? [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 9:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Stevison (7th Cir. 1972) (affirming the denial of a defendants proposed coercion instruction where the defendant had not alleged that she had no opportunity, other than embezzling funds, to avoid her daughter’s threatened suicide). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Furthermore, it must be established that the victim (plaintiff) was a patient of the dentist (defendant). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Furthermore, it must be established that the victim (plaintiff) was a patient of the dentist (defendant). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
Furthermore, it must be established that the victim (plaintiff) was a patient of the dentist (defendant). [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 2:53 am
Inherent vice is an exclusion which states that the insurer is not liable if the cause of the loss is an inherent problem (or vice) with the cargo itself and not a 'peril of the sea' (see s.55 of the Marine Insurance Act 1906).The court said that inherent inability to withstand the ordinary incidents of a voyage was clearly an appropriate test of inherent vice. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:36 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
” AHC claims the Defendant, Rylie Investments LLC (“Rylie”) also provides HVAC services in Indiana under the name “Armor Air. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:32 am
Posted by Jason Halper, Nathan Bull, and James Fee Rahman, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, on Thursday, September 20, 2018 Editor's Note: Jason M. [read post]