Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 6521 - 6540 of 10,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2013, 6:41 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner included with her petition a letter from the director of the children’s elementary school in Brussels containing favorable comments from the children’s teachers; the older child’s school records showing average or above average marks; and a letter from a neighbor tenant in Brussels containing favorable comments about the family. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:09 am by R. David Donoghue
  The Court held that DENTAL USA and UNITED DENTAL USA were “self-evidently very similar marks. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:58 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Perhaps the transmission of this type of information alone is harmful, but as this case shows, that justification will not necessarily fly with a court that is vigilant on First Amendment issues. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:54 am
From Katfriend Harm van der Heijden comes news of xepc.eu, his cross-referenced website on European Patent Convention (EPC) and Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)  patent law. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:03 pm by Georgialee Lang
Defamation is defined as a false statement that harms a person or business’s reputation. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:07 am by Allison Tussey
“The harm to the community has been enormous, and we hope that the prison sentences that have been imposed have sent a message to others that this type of crime will not be tolerated. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:32 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Bottom line, said the court, "everything that Section 33.021(b) prohibits and punishes is speech and is either already prohibited by other statutes (such as obscenity, distributing harmful material to minors, solicitation of a minor, or child pornography) or is constitutionally protected." [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:23 am by Dan Harris
 There are two variations on this one, one much more sophisticated and harmful than the other. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
” Posing the question “Is this conduct so wrongful and so harmful that, in the opinion of Parliament, it should be publicly condemned and, in proper cases, punished? [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This week marks the 35th anniversary of the passage of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) of 1978. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:16 am by Steve Baird
And, when a defendant willfully intends to trade on the reputation of a famous mark or willfully intends to harm the mark’s reputation, this opens the door to remedies beyond mere injunctive relief. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:41 am
Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450, marked to the attention of Bonita Royall. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:51 am
In spite of much stiffer penalties and increased public awareness concerning the harms of committing that criminal offense, it seems people are still doing it regularly. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/PZninMX1D5 -> National Photo Group Brings Copyright Suit to Protect Interests in Photos http://t.co/lt2wscvHKd -> EU: Right to be forgotten now the right to erasure | Privacy This Week http://t.co/JNJ56fjQnY -> Cyber criminals cost India $4 billion in 2013: Symantec http://t.co/mQqQBIQtQi -> Bill C-56 in Parliament http://t.co/ph7EEFS082 -> Pirate Bay cofounder appeals hacking case, argues to halt his extradition http://t.co/N6gpOAa9Fl -> Five Essential Music Copyright… [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)   I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 4:26 pm by Giancarlo Frosio
The target SLK board member was Jewish and several comments had a marked, and in some instances especially ignominious, anti-Semitic flare. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Graham Smith
Article 5(3) lays down, as the sole condition, that a harmful event has occurred or may occur. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:57 am
This Kat is not so shocked from the stance taken by the Court, as departure from the ‘intention to target’ approach may be justified on consideration that (as recalled by the Court itself) “Article 5(3) lays down, as the sole condition, that a harmful event has occurred or may occur. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:32 pm by Afro Leo
It has galvanised thought on the topic as these comments and other listed below explain.Additional commentary:Academics' joint submission Harms’ notesTrade Mark notesPatent notesCopyright notesMoubray's notesStellenbosch University's submission [read post]