Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 6521 - 6540 of 16,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2016, 9:23 am by Eric Goldman
The court says the 2013 order didn’t bind the search engines because they weren’t parties to the action and didn’t have an opportunity to contest it. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Other possibilities: certification marks, etc. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 11:12 am by Edward Smith
Run to Feed the Hungry Run to Feed the Hungry I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento personal injury lawyer. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am by Victoria Kwan
According to Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, the event was closed to media. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:03 am by Ben
This is a further updated posted by Eleonora Rosati on the IPKat on the same case, and one we though we shoukd share in the 1709 Blog.This was a reference for a preliminary ruling from the French Conseil d’État (Council of State) and concerned the compatibility with EU law [read: the InfoSoc Directive] of the 2012 French law to allow and regulate the digital exploitation of out-of-print 20th century books.The late Marc Soulier, also known as AyerdhalAs explained… [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:35 am
The late Marc Soulier,also known as AyerdhalAs reported by this blog through a breaking news post, yesterday the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its decision in Soulier and Doke, C-301/15.This was a reference for a preliminary ruling from the French Conseil d’État (Council of State) and concerned the compatibility with EU law [read: the InfoSoc Directive] of the 2012 French law to allow and regulate the digital… [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The point is not that this is a good argument, but that the reason it seems so obviously weak is a matter of norms and history. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:10 am by Evan Mix
This ruling isn’t the end of the matter—TPW has simply been denied a preliminary injunction, meaning Yelp can continue using the mark while the parties continue to litigate. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Mark McKenna
 The reason is that, for most of the last fifty years, courts have been telling us that, with a few exceptions, registration really doesn’t matter. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 11:58 am by Law Office of Michael D. Maurer, P.A.
The plaintiff later testified that he parked there because he was driving a 22-foot-long crew cab truck that wouldn’t fit in the marked spots. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
The court has asked the US Solicitor General for his opinion on the matter, suggesting it might proceed with the case. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:25 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
As the Federal Circuit pointed out, there is no clear precedent that disparaging marks are entitled to common law trademark protection. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:25 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
As the Federal Circuit pointed out, there is no clear precedent that disparaging marks are entitled to common law trademark protection. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Beebe & Fromer study question premise of infinite supply of word marks. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As a matter of law, Tropper wasn’t vicariously liable for copyright infringement. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Court then moved onto the meat of the matter, namely whether the mark infringed Article 7(1)(b) through a lack of distinctive character. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:58 pm
Those privileges include not insubstantially in the United States, great protection against liability for the follies of its reporting, no matter how destructive. [read post]