Search for: "People v. Herring" Results 6521 - 6540 of 23,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court’s 1986 Batson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 11:01 am by Victoria Kwan
Citing Chief Justice Earl Warren’s short, unanimous decision in Brown v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:16 am by Kevin Kaufman
Step-up in basis discourages people from realizing capital gains. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:27 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Good Faith Exception for Warrantless Blood Draws in Illinois Similar to Arizona, in People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am by Peter Margulies
The March 6 decision by Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California in California v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
White concluded this section of her speech with the following: “We cannot say that a law does not comport with our mission as we see it, and ignore a Congressional mandate. [read post]