Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 13,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2017, 3:07 pm
On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 3:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Here, the DSS filed a petition alleging neglect pursuant to article 10 of the Family Court Act. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm
By Kiran Jassal Law students across the United States are familiar with “The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation,” prepared by the Harvard Law Review Association. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 10:37 am
I had wanted to say a few words about the Supreme Court's June 8 decision to hear United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:19 pm
United States, a case argued this week at the Supreme Court, illustrates a variant of "acoustic separation" at work. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was… [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:52 am
Matter of Mott v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:03 am
TBMP § 1113.01.Early Recognition claimed the right to exclusive use of the subject mark for the entire United States, except for the County of San Francisco within the state of California. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:00 am
The employer appealed the BRB”s decision to the United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, arguing that the BRB overlooked the medical statements made in claimant’s deposition testimony. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 4:20 am
” At ACSblog, Bidish Sarma discusses Packingham v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:53 am
In Iancu v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 1:09 pm
This week at the CCAs: On Tuesday, the Coast Guard Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 5:11 pm
Circuit claiming that the "open platforms for devices and applications" portions of the auction rules (the "no locking, no blocking" rules): exceed the Commission's authority under the Communications Actviolate the United States Constitutionviolate the Administrative Procedure Actand are arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence and otherwise contrary to law.Just as a guess, I'd say that VZ Wireless intends to claim that, as in Fox… [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
As I noted last week and major news outlets have also reported, the United States Supreme Court is poised next week to consider taking up the North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering case involving the so-called Independent-State- Legislature (ISL) theory. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
" AT&T's petition first argues that certiorari is warranted because the decision of the en banc court "clearly departs" not only from the holdings of the Sixth and Seventh Circuits, but also from Supreme Court precedent such as United Airlines v. [read post]
