Search for: "R v. E" Results 6521 - 6540 of 15,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3,E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5, H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2,P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Claims for “[e]xtortion and attempted extortion are criminal offenses (see Penal Law§ 155.05[2][e]; § 110.00) that do not imply a private right of action” (Minnelli v Soumayah, 41 AD3d 388, 389 [1st Dept 2007]). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
Cristino, supra.The court then explained that[w]e compare the present case to two recent decisions by the Supr [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
“The duty in s.49A applies both when the local authority is drawing up its criteria and when it applies them in an individual case, both of those being an aspect of carrying out its functions”: per Black J in R (JL) v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:34 am by INFORRM
Richard E North v Sunday Times, Adjudication 26 November 2010. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 8:05 am by Elodie Grangier
Ces règles ont eu pour objet de créer un véritable statut pour les télétravailleurs de plus en plus nombreux. [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:52 am by Kyle Persaud
Your employer (rather than yourself) should file Form I-129 if you were admitted under one of the following categories: • E-1 or E-2 (Treaty Traders, Treaty Investors, and Employees of Treaty Traders and Treaty Investors) • E-3 (Skilled Professionals from Australia) • H-1B, H-2A, H-2B, or H-3 (Temporary Skilled or Unskilled Workers and Trainees) • L-1A or L-1B (Intracompany Transferees) • O-1 or O-2 (Aliens with… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:30 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
As irregularidades vêm acontecendo no meio eletrônico, especialmente no comércio feito pela internet. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:24 am
Free speech limitations on public employees Wasson v Sonoma Co. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 12:19 pm
Par la correction au titre de la règle 89 CBE, une décision n'est pas changée sur le fond mais elle n'est que rétablie dans la forme manifestement envisagée par ses auteurs. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:46 pm by (admin)
Na sequência, assistiram a uma exibição de fotos e palavras (tipo imagens de casais homossexuais ou palavras relacionadas a cada um dos dois grupos) e, na medida em que eram mostradas, precisavam encaixá-las o mais rápido possível na categoria apropriada (héteros ou gays). [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:40 pm
§ 1125(c))• Count V - Federal Cybersquatting - ACPA and Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:54 pm
Today, the Supreme Court released its decision and opinion in Rodriguez v. [read post]