Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2013, 1:55 pm
United States, 100 Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
Punitive damages can, for example, be awarded in defamation cases in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:41 pm
Some Poor Fuckup or United States of America v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:48 pm
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:38 pm
Jan. 7, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the “short-swing profits rule” imposed by Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:42 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed a District Court's grant of summary judgment in an action alleging TIN Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am
Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:04 am
At this point, with the advice of an ex-editor friend of mine, I decided to reframe the issue once more, into a short book about the history of the bald eagle as a symbol in the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
Other federal banking regulators, as well as most state regulators, also require universal fidelity coverage. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In October of this past year, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Department of Energy, "20% Wind Energy by 2030" (July 2008), stated that such European shallow-water technology is too expensive and too difficult to site in U.S. waters. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
§ 78u-4 (“Reform Act”), should be applied less rigorously in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In a high profile disqualification dispute, Covington & Burling was disqualified in the case of State of Minnesota v. 3M. [read post]
