Search for: "State v. Billings"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
State Dep’t of Human Servs., 146 N.J. 614, 621 (1996). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:23 pm
A good example of this happened in Jennifer Kauffman v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Luis V. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
TERRY, Appellant, v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:30 pm
Clean Air Act Exemptions- The bill would specifically exempt greenhouse gases from coverage under the Title V program, New Source Review Program, NAAQS, and HAPs. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court called Quill Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:24 am
Bill Lucino, Majestic Kitchens, Inc., No. 13-0796 (2d Cir. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:57 pm
The third factor—whether the regulation intruded on legislative debate—was satisfied by the City Council’s rejection of three resolutions specifically targeting sugar sweetened beverages and the state legislature’s failure to pass three bills on the subject. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:58 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:14 am
She one time stated that "Middle Easterners are lazy" and complained to a co-worker when "another one" was hired. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
17 Jun 2025, 6:45 am
The state appeals again. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:03 am
Scarlet v SABAM The SABAM is the Belgian equivalent of PRS, a royalty collecting agency representing music artists. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
And they'd be especially devastating for states like Kentucky and other coal states. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
The HawkTalk blog has an article analysing Clause 68A of the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 3:35 am
Metro Office has the latest on the Persuader Rule, the Supreme Court’s 4-4 tie decision in Friedrichs v. [read post]
