Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 23,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2006, 12:28 pm
This quote pretty much encapsulates the approach taken by the Supreme Court of Appeal in its judgment which it handed down earlier today in the matter of Schabir Shaik v The State. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 9:24 am
Gamboa is qualified to offer an opinion in this case and that he has extensive experience as an expert in state and district court cases across the country. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 7:57 am
Supreme Court: Gill v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Samantar v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:56 pm
On April 1, 2011, in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
” After the State Department provides Congress with the requested report, Congress may “terminat[e], restrict[e], or continu[e]” security assistance to the country that was the subject of the targeted report through a joint resolution of disapproval. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:33 am
Local Laws: Defamation laws vary widely by country and even by state or province within countries. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Since we blogged about the Supreme Court’s certiorari grant in Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 9:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled Thursday in the case Central Unitaria de Traballadores/as v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:00 am
Hornback v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:00 am
Hornback v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 1:28 pm
See Philadelphia v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:30 am
” (para. 134) The Schrems II judgment will require many EU data controllers to reassess, and in some cases adapt, the mechanisms they use to transfer data internationally, not just to the United States but potentially to other foreign countries as well. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 11:34 am
Supreme Court on Oct. 16, 2017, announced it had granted the government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
In the past decade, courts and state legislatures have hastened this ebb; five more states have become right-to-work, and the Supreme Court has rendered all public-sector unions unable to bargain mandatory agencies fees in Janus v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
The law pursued a legitimate goal of social protection for tenants and tended to promote the economic well-being of the country (Barreto v Portugal App No 18072/91). [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
The law pursued a legitimate goal of social protection for tenants and tended to promote the economic well-being of the country (Barreto v Portugal App No 18072/91). [read post]
