Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 8,120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 6:54 am
Holder, concerning the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
"); United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
The key case on originality in Canada is CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm
Following decisions in such cases as Connelly v RTZ, Lubbe v Cape and Ngcobo v Thor Chemicals, the present case contributes to the development of the law relating to the jurisdiction of English co [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
That development is important not merely for its internal effects but for what it might offer to other states as a model of legitimating constitutionalism (and the construction of constitutional states) that varies in fundamental respects from the forms and expression of constitutionalism and the construction of constitutional states in the West. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
(Zelig v. [read post]
Qualcomm's Mannheim Steamroller is stuttering: patents too young to defeat Apple in tech-savvy court
3 Oct 2018, 11:22 am
The first Qualcomm v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
They include, but are not limited to the following:"Creators, rightholders, intermediaries, users, copyright law and state or quasi state institutions form a complex feedback system in which technological change is a factor. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm
Among other cases, the Supreme Courtandrsquo;s majority opinion cited the 1987 case Shearson/American Express Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
United States, 334 U.S. 742, 767 n.9 (1948) (citation omitted), as well as the Supreme Court’s directive in Boumediene that “[i]n considering both the procedural and substantive standards used to impose detention to prevent acts of terrorism, proper deference must be accorded to the political branches,” 128 S.Ct. at 2276 (2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Gillespie v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
Holder. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
DiRuzza v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(IP tango) Europe IP work disrupted by volcano (Managing Intellectual Property) When the dog expires - General Court decision in Rodd & Gunn Australia Ltd v OHIM (IPKat) Questions emerge over undisclosed terms of new EPO president’s contract (IAM) OHIM’s case law review for 2009 now available (Class 46) Gala and Golden Delicious share latest GI (Class 46) Bad Kissinger gets no GI protection as Commission strikes out German mass application (IPKat) European Commission… [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Holder and Abbott v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
“He was also counsel in CCR’s legal challenges to the ‘material support’ statute (Holder v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
“He was also counsel in CCR’s legal challenges to the ‘material support’ statute (Holder v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
See, e.g., ACands, Inc. v. [read post]
