Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS" Results 6521 - 6540 of 8,564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
United States, which held that judges of the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm by Nicole Kellner-Swick
District Court, District of Arizona (Phoenix); appellate case, Cervantes v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:55 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Roy Malpass of the University of Texas at El Paso about the potential pitfalls of eyewitness identification in a capital murder case.The opinion (State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
"       On September 12, in a lengthy company release, Luminant, the largest power generator in Texas that employees approximately 4,400 employees throughout the state (2,580 in coal plant and mining operations) announced the need to close facilities and layoff workers to comply with U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:51 pm by Jim Dempsey
Supreme Court in what could be one of the major Fourth Amendment cases of the decade, U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
Texas, on which the district court had relied in invalidating DADT. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am by Lyle Denniston
U.S., 10-1337), a plea to allow users of cellphones to sue under state law to claim exposure to radiation from using such devices (Farina v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:29 am
The government lost the case in the lower court and now asks the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:28 am by Roger Alford
Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), the committee has taken special care to reflect in its record of consideration of treaties its understanding of how each treaty will be implemented, including whether the treaty is self-executing…. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:19 am by Kiera Flynn
A group of House Democrats sent a letter to the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am by Marie Louise
(Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog)   US Patents No patent for claimed method of patenting (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Disqualifying plaintiff’s litigation counsel based upon former joint defense agreement: In re Shared Memory Graphics LLC (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC: No evidence for priority claim: Cordance v Amazon (IPBiz) CAFC dismisses for lack of jurisdiction: Spread Spectrum v Eastman Kodak (IPBiz) District Court E D Texas:… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:10 am by John McFarland
The Eighth Court of Appeals in El Paso has issued its opinion in State of Texas v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:20 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]