Search for: "United States v. Grant"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 25,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
To grant federal habeas relief for a state conviction, the state conviction must be “contrary to, or involve[] an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:46 am
Ever since the US Supreme Court ruled in Morrison et al v National Australia Bank Ltd et al that claimants not residing in the United States or American citizens who purchased shares on a foreign exchange can’t settle or litigate their case in the US, these parties have been seeking other jurisdictions to get their claims resolved. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:29 am
United States, 340 U.S. 193, 199 (1950)). [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:00 am
Smith & Nephew, case number 19-1458, the Supreme Court of the United States recently held that Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) judges are unconstitutionally appointed. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:36 am
P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:10 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
United States). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:58 pm
The United States of America). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
United States Liability Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 8:22 pm
A fundamental principle of criminal law requires any law enforcement officer following an arrest to advise the arrested person of certain Constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 8:22 pm
A fundamental principle of criminal law requires any law enforcement officer following an arrest to advise the arrested person of certain Constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
United States) and June 27, 2023 (Counterman v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
If that was the political calculation, then the circumstances surrounding it became much more complicated with the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Greens v United Kingdom at the end of last month. [read post]
30 May 2009, 12:29 pm
United States ; United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:14 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 3:12 pm
On November 9, 2012, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a criminal DNA testing case, Maryland v. [read post]
15 Dec 2024, 12:02 pm
§ 1701(a), the President may exercise extraordinary economic powers after “declar[ing] a national emergency with respect to” any “unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:00 am
Cal, March 15, 2016), was decided by United States District Judge Vince Chhabria. [read post]
