Search for: "ACT Business LLC" Results 6541 - 6560 of 10,596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2014, 6:35 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The Court granted leave to appeal from a decision of Division 6 of the First District, Financial Freedom Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:22 pm by Mack Sperling
The Business Court found further light shed on the term "substantial benefit" by looking to the Model Business Corporation Act, which references in a comment the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of similar language in MBCA §7.46(1). [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:33 am
Idanta made a conscious decision to aid the Operating Group in performing a wrongful act; here, it was improperly acquiring rights to the AML business methods, and hiring the Operating Group to execute those methods. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Heartland sued for false advertising under the Lanham Act and state law, and related business torts. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:43 am by Mack Sperling
The Business Court rejected the Plaintiff's argument that he, as a 50% owner of the LLCs, had the authority under the new LLC Act to hire counsel without the consent of his adversarial member. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
IntelliGender, LLC, -- F.3d ---, No. 13–56806, 2014 WL 5786718 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:42 am by Peter Mahler
When not tightly drafted, expulsion provisions in shareholder or LLC operating agreements can cause a lot more trouble than they’re worth. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 2:52 pm by Carl Neff
 Will an investment in the LLC cause a member to be subject to income or estate taxes in the state where the LLC does business? [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
., LLC http://t.co/wwAsAod7HK -> Harris: Political ads give lesson on copyright infringement http://t.co/cmnEY90kM6 -> Facebook Copyright Infringement & The Case Against It http://t.co/K5o0sNapP0 -> David Petraeus, ex-CIA head, says security must be balanced by privacy http://t.co/upz646wBWO -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-11-01 http://t.co/qbeDflWrnT -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-11-01: Online hate speech could be… [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 4:04 am by SHG
Copyright © 2014 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 3:49 am by SHG
We do use deception at times to catch crooks, but we are acting responsibly and legally. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:30 pm by Miriam Seifter
FCC, and it will confront another one when it hears argument Monday in T-Mobile South LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:40 am
., which is a subsidiary of Hallmark Cards [the level of cuteness of a Hallmark card written in crayolas is almost unbearable] and Defendant is Alex Toys, LLC. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:00 pm
In order to be principally localized in Alabama, or another state, the employer must have a place of business in the specific state, and the employee regularly works out of that place of business, or if the employee is domiciled and spends substantial part of the employee's working time in service of the employer in that specific state. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm by Lorene Park
A federal court in New Jersey denied Canon’s motion for summary judgment on her class action claim that it had a nationwide practice of taking adverse employment actions without complying with the FCRA and that it willfully violated the Act by never providing her a copy of the report, describing her rights under the Act, or giving her a chance to explain the conviction before firing her (McPherson v Canon Business Solutions, Inc). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
I sue in California court — a logical place, since this is where I live, and (let’s assume) where the defendants have their principal place of business (they are headquartered in California though they also do lots of business in Oklahoma), so it’s not unfair to subject them to California courts’ jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:29 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The order also held Bruister Family LLC liable with all defendants for $885,065 and jointly liable with Bruister for $390,604. [read post]