Search for: "Birth v. Birth"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 7,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 5:47 am
See State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 12:25 pm
The phrase “substantial control” is not defined in the CTA so further regulations should clarify its meaning.9 The legislation expressly excludes certain individuals from the definition of “beneficial ownership,” including (i) a minor child (as long as the child’s parent’s or guardian’s information is reported); (ii) an individual acting as an intermediary or agent on behalf of another; (iii) a person whose control over a reporting company derives solely… [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Way back in 1983, in Bearden v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm
The Florida 2000 presidential election—which involved the infamous locally designed “butterfly ballot” and the inconsistent local treatment of disputed ballots that led to Bush v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 8:00 am
Eid v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:51 am
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said it best in his dissent in Northern Securities Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:00 pm
Section V – Service Information Here, you will provide information regarding your time in service, including information such as your branch of service and your enlistment/discharge dates. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
The Court of Appeals actually considered this issue in Larsen v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
In or about 2010, he was removed from his birth mother’s home and placed in non-kinship foster care with respondent Acquinetta M. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
In or about 2010, he was removed from his birth mother’s home and placed in non-kinship foster care with respondent Acquinetta M. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:52 pm
A nomination satisfies the reasonable suspicion prong and must also include “sufficient identifiers”—at the very least a last name and another piece of information, like a first name or date of birth—so that the airlines and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) can determine whether to allow the individual to board. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 6:47 pm
” In Washington v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
” Minor v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
V. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm
Dec. 27, 1972), and the Court agreed that "sex" is "an immutable characteristic determined solely by the accident of birth," Frontiero v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
And in Lin v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am
., the ECJ obliged Bulgaria to recognise the Spanish birth certificate of a child in which two female EU citizens, married to each other, were named as the child’s parents, as far as the implementation of the free movement of persons under EU law was concerned, but left the determination of the family law effects of the certificate to Bulgarian law. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:53 pm
., business, there’s your basic initial-interest confusion birth-of-a-nation moment right there. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:08 pm
Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:13 am
B. v. [read post]
