Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 8,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2011, 6:48 pm
Gov’t Code § 81.011(a), says that the State Bar is “an administrative agency of the judicial branch of government. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:59 pm
" Micron Tech. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:28 am
United States and Boeing v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:23 am
Finally, the administration's request for reversal in the pending Mazda Motors v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:55 am
"The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint, but it should also have denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the first cause of action to recover on an account stated. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:50 pm
As Judge Easterbrook states in Union Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm
" The Members' recent invocation of this Clause as a defense and a tool in their fight against the Executive Branch's investigations of them likely will go to the courts. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
R (Ali Zaki Mousa) v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:29 pm
On Friday, the Seventh Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
Does comity between co-equal branches of government mean nothing to the Supreme Court? [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 5:16 pm
On Thursday, the federal government filed its much anticipated appellate brief (full text) in Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
(09-1298) and Boeing Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
", this IPKat wonders.)Justice Phang stated that the Singapore courts are concerned to make sure that there is consistency of law between different branches of IP law and statutes – the intra and inter-IP harmony. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:16 am
See Mayo Foundation v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:59 pm
City of Long Branch v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:13 pm
Both state and federal courts give certain appellate cases priority. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:07 am
Varnum When the Iowa Supreme Court decided the Varnum v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 pm
Only in the latter case are the assets located at the branch attributable to the claimant. [read post]
