Search for: "Courts and Judicial System" Results 6541 - 6560 of 26,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 7:17 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
In other words, Bickel’s error was in not recognizing that it is the Constitution, rather than judicial review, that is the deviant institution in a system where democracy is defined as majority rule. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:10 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Also, everyone who has ever come into contact with the judicial system realizes it is a slow process. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:09 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
" The Supreme Court doesn't understand patent law or science, but the biggest problem is that the courts "don't focus enough on the systemic effect. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:45 pm
The impact of the Act thus far has been felt throughout the federal system, with particularly strong impacts show in district courts in the 9th circuit, particularly in California. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Remedial collapse, after all, is a consequence of a systemic design that courts did not create and courts cannot correct. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Today, the Court is comprised of a diverse group of men and women who more nearly reflect the population of America.The Federal Judicial Center lists recently published court histories here. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
”—Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law School “In this engrossing and meticulous assessment of civil cases in local and state courts, Melissa Milewski builds on considerable research to discern African Americans’ legal strategies for protecting their hard-earned rights and navigating the judicial landscape of the New South. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 10:32 am by Dennis Crouch
The legal rule incentivizes unfairness against patentees, motivates gamesmanship by accused infringers, leads to wasted judicial effort by trial and appeals courts, and disincentivizes innovation by undermining confidence in the patent system. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 7:52 am by Howard Friedman
The Statute still provides for civil, nonreligious ceremonies performed by judges, while also allowing those who wish to be married in a religious ceremony to do so.The court also rejected an equal protection challenge, saying in part:The Statute in this case rationally serves that purpose by limiting secular officiants to current and retired judges and by leaving it up to the religious organization—any religious organization—to determine who is authorized in accordance with its… [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 6:17 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Unpaid interns want companies to pay up Study shows SCOTUS justices resort to ‘intensifier’ words more often in dissent Hearing Set for Lawsuit Disputing Detroit’s Bankruptcy Filing Scalia's Judicial Scam—In Detail-Part 2 Legal assistance funding cuts threaten most at-risk (with video) - Windsor Star (blog) 'Lost Canadian' fighting nonsensical law that prevents war babies from becoming citizens Case Against a Canadian Investment Banker Highlights SEC's Expansive… [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:55 pm by Jon Sands
The district court dismissed Juror #5 (a paralegal who had practiced as a defense lawyer in the Philippines) because of malice towards the judicial system and a refusal to deliberate. [read post]
The prevalence of settlements in class and derivative litigation challenging mergers and acquisitions in which the only payment is to plaintiffs’ attorneys suggests potential systemic dysfunction arising from the increased frequency of parallel litigation in multiple state courts. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
 Speaking with being in box, we wonder whether our judicial leadership, who were slow to close the courts, have a plan on reopening the court system? [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
News from the Arizona Supreme Court: The Administrative Office of the Courts is pleased to announce the approval of Arizona’s application for funding through the John R. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 1:54 pm
”Many now remember her appointment as one of the defining acts of Schwarzenegger’s governorship, and one that changed the trajectory of California’s court system. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
 A majority of the cases examined here were not appealed, nor did they create important judicial precedent. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:11 am by Staci Zaretsky
[DealBook / New York Times] * At least six of the Supreme Court’s judicial precedents are up for reconsideration in the upcoming Term, and high court commentators think the resulting decisions could be a mixed bag. [read post]