Search for: "Doe, Appeal of"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 106,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
” VIP appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Ninth Circuit held that VIP’s dog toy was a communication of a humorous message and required heightened scrutiny to ensure that trademark protection for Jack Daniels did not intrude upon VIP’s First Amendment rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
” VIP appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Ninth Circuit held that VIP’s dog toy was a communication of a humorous message and required heightened scrutiny to ensure that trademark protection for Jack Daniels did not intrude upon VIP’s First Amendment rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:47 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit upheld that ruling. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
” VIP appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Ninth Circuit held that VIP’s dog toy was a communication of a humorous message and required heightened scrutiny to ensure that trademark protection for Jack Daniels did not intrude upon VIP’s First Amendment rights. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:28 am
In reaching its decision, the Court settled a split among the Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and First Circuits on the one hand and the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on the other hand, siding with the Ninth and First Circuits that 11 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:44 am
It’s been suggested that the Department does not want to negatively impact her already-tenuous nomination status by issuing controversial rules before she receives Senate approval. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
Here's what he says:"Doe entered the women’s restroom, which has two stalls, a small one and a larger one for people with disabilities. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
" If that is true, and we assume it is true under Rule 12(b)(6), then plaintiff does assert he was denied a liberty interest. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 4:50 am
The father appealed this decision. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 3:56 am
” The panel majority endorsed the Board’s factual finding that a “listing of command codes does not teach or suggest a listing of communication methods. [read post]
Price Limits, Affordability Boards, Penalties, Oh My: Minnesota Enacts Sweeping Drug Pricing Reforms
16 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
Any person affected by a Board decision may request an appeal within 30 days of that decision, but note that it is the Board who makes the initial decision, hears the appeal, and renders the appeal decision. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a bench trial verdict finding that the dog toy infringed and diluted Jack Daniel’s trademarks, reasoning that the dog toy was “expressive” and thus the lower court erred by not applying the Rogers test. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:51 pm
On appeal, the U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:49 pm
Following his conviction, Smith appealed to the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit who found that, while the original venue was improper, Smith was not entitled to double jeopardy protection from prosecution in a proper venue. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:20 pm
That does not surprise people who knew him when he served on the federal appeals court in Denver. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 2:20 pm
The case is an appeal of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision affirming an Examiner’s rejection of the claims at issue as obvious. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
United States, 22-5993Issue: Whether a judge denies a defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights by increasing a prison sentence based on disputed facts the court did not find beyond a reasonable doubt, but for which the sentence would be stricken as substantively unreasonable on appeal. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:10 pm
The Court of Appeal’s Opinion The Court of Appeal held as a matter of law that the trial court misapplied the “interrelated factors test” in denying the preliminary injunction in the CEQA action. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:03 pm
June 7, 2023) the Georgia Court of Appeals explains why the position is wrong: As an initial matter, it appears that Leslie has failed to show that his requested accommodation to waive the pet fees for his dog was “necessary to afford him an opportunity to use and enjoy his dwelling. [read post]
