Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 6541 - 6560 of 28,709
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
All encountered difficulties with the placement and punctuation of the phrase “using a random or sequential number generator” within Section 227(a)(1)(A) of the Act. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am by Bona Law PC
Tippins, case No. 20-55735 In this case, the dental board defendants moved to dismiss similar claims for anticompetitive conduct based on a state-action immunity defense. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Judgments which treat this idea with kindness, or at least do not dismiss it out of hand, are to be welcomed[20]. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:19 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
But at any rate the denial of a fundamental right such as the property right (i.e. here the patent right) does not seem justified if the criteria used to accept the ASI are not intended to qualify an abuse of the patentee’s right. ******************************************************************** [1] High Court ([2017] EWHC 2988 – Patent) upheld by the Court of Appeals ([2018] EWCA Civ 2344 ; [2018] RPC 20) and the Supreme Court ([2020] UKSC 3). [2] See… [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 2:42 pm by Joy Waltemath
The EEOC thus rescinded portions of its ADA wellness rule on December 20, 2018 (83 FR 65296). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 10:01 am by William Ford, Tia Sewell
  Tuesday, December 15, 2020, at 1:00 p.m.: The Atlantic Council will host a live discussion addressing how global litigation strategies can help advance human rights in Iran. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:47 am by Mansell Law
Second, this exemption also does not apply to you if you provide “care” services to your clients during more than 20% of your workweek. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pillar 1, Amount A Scoping Decisions This response focuses on three issues the Inclusive Framework should consider on Pillar 1, Amount A. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm by Yale Hauptman
  Even though you are not required to take your RMD does it still make sense to take it anyway? [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach –… [read post]