Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 6541 - 6560 of 9,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2011, 3:57 pm by Howard Knopf
Trade-marks law does not prevent the “use” in language of the trade-mark for descriptive, critical or other legitimate purposes. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:39 pm by David Lat
Expect Prop 8 proponents to turn to a higher court in 3, 2, 1…. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by James Yang
Aug. 13, 2015), the Federal Circuit sitting en banc provided a comprehensive definition of direct patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:45 am by Matt Osenga
Means-plus-function clauses are permitted in claims by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:01 am by Kit Case
The 2007 rate cuts cost the system $315 million, or the 2007 equivalent of a 35% rate decrease. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
” The district court acknowledged that while expert testimony is not required to prove damages under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 1:21 pm
August 1, 2007Re: Increasing The Size Of The Supreme Court.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by James Yang
He gives specific next steps to fix the current problems with Alice/Mayo two step analysis. 1. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:25 am
Doris Silk Corp., 35 F.2d 279 (2d Cir. 1929), cert. denied, 281 U.S. 728 (1930). [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by James Yang
Aug. 13, 2015), the Federal Circuit sitting en banc provided a comprehensive definition of direct patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 9:03 pm by Guest Contributor
” Fact #1: Under Secretary for the USDA Office of Food Safety Dr. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:20 am by Michael Geist
  If the President does not certify the other countries, the agreement does not take effect. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:10 am by MPS
Here are 10 things you should consider before getting a new credit card after filing bankruptcy: 1. [read post]