Search for: "EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT" Results 6541 - 6560 of 22,385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2020, 8:26 am
It comes after much thoughtful discussion with our internal team and consultation with outside counsel, and in agreement with INTA’s President, Officers, and Counsel. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am by Sandy Levinson
 But the real point of this posting is that we now seem to live in a world where it is only the President of the United States who is held unaccountable for behavior that increasingly draws scrutiny and discipline with regard to even high executives of other organizations. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:15 pm by John Floyd
Never in modern recorded history have so many Americans believed a President of the United States should not only be removed from office but prosecuted as a “war criminal. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm by Daily Record Staff
Also, Frank Long was promoted from executive vice president of store operations to chief operating officer; Todd Kirssin was promoted from executive vice president and general merchandise manager ... [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Kalvis Golde
In the case of David Chandler, the justices were spared from acting by a grant of clemency from President Bill Clinton “two hours before [he] left office in 2001. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:06 am by Greg Reed
  Issuing an executive order instructing federal agencies to expand hiring of people with disabilities. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The move coincided with President Trump’s declaration on Twitter that the government was treating Stone too harshly. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 3:33 pm by Stephen Griffin
  That's because the unitary executive stresses the sole responsibility of the president (not the Attorney General or any other principal or inferior officer) to control the executive branch. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
    According to Kevin LaCroix, executive vice president of RT ProExec, particular companies face significant increases. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 8:51 am by Jackie McDermott
… some [Framers] were quite worried that a president interested in using the powers of the office, either to enrich himself, or in conflict with the interests of the nation would not necessarily be removable if the only standard were treason and bribery. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:29 am by Ilya Shapiro and Trevor Burrus
Because the executive power is vested by the Constitution exclusively in the president, any officer who exercises that [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Amy Teng
U.S. that certain executive agencies maintain some independence “disconnected from the executive department,” and their directors may be removable by the president only for cause. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 7:09 am by Tyler Green
And during that five-year term, the president may remove the director only for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:01 am by SHG
  But using “command influence” by the president, through Main Justice, to the line prosecutors, to withdraw a sentencing recommendation for a crony of the president, never happens. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Graham Webster
It also could help Chinese intelligence to probe President Trump’s networks outside of government. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Alan Morrison
Indeed, President Donald Trump could have fired the CFPB director appointed by President Barack Obama for 10 months after taking office, but he chose not to do so. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:00 am by Adam White
The “quasi-judicial,” “quasi-legislative” distinction long predated Roosevelt and Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes; it dated back at least 40 years, to the Interstate Commerce Commission, which Congress created in the same year that it repealed the Tenure of Office Act for executive officers. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Scott R. Anderson
The executive branch, however, has long maintained that the president has the exclusive constitutional authority to “supervise and control the work of subordinate offices and employees of the Executive Branch” and to “protect national security and other privileged information”—an authority that Congress cannot interfere with through legislation like the Lloyd-LaFollette Act. [read post]