Search for: "English v. English" Results 6541 - 6560 of 11,203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2019, 12:25 am
They were opposed by the Harvard Club of Singapore.Looking at an interesting question raised by a case in China, Asia Correspondent Tian Lu considers whether the ungrammatical metaphrase of the Chinese sign counts when it comes to assessing the similarities between two verbal signs - one in Chinese and the other in English. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:26 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
In our recent paper, we critique Abbott’s proposal whilst contemplating AI’s status as property or person.It is perhaps most interesting to compare the contrasting fortunes of the Project’s filings in Australia (Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879) and England and Wales (Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs And Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat)/Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs [2021] EWCA Civ… [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
"All this is compliant with the GAT and Folien decisions and the Corte di Cassazione ruling, as well the UK decision in Joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) and Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [here]. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:26 am
This decision comes after the English Courts had similarly refused the registration of the same Shape Marks in the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:36 pm by Linda McClain
 The husband is also “the administrator of the property of the conjugal partnership,” unless otherwise stipulated (Art. 59).These provisions of the Civil Code, rooted in Spanish influence,  have parallels in the English common law system of coverture, a system that, as the Supreme Court explained in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:04 am by Kiel Brennan-Marquez
For a concrete example of what I have in mind, consider Yates v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
  The Supreme Court has taken the view in Actavis v Eli Lilly that there is a law of equivalents - that's what the EPC says, and that must be adopted in English law. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:12 am
This decision comes after the English Courts had similarly refused the registration of the same Shape Marks in the United Kingdom. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:28 pm by Florian Mueller
The rule of law does not get infected by any virus.Legal industry news service Juve (whose English-language spinoff Juve Patent I sometimes link to) reported on who represented the parties. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
We now know that “in order to find the rules of the English law of breach of confidence we now have to look in the jurisprudence of articles 8 and 10” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
” Mr Justice LeBlanc, delivering judgment also considered the principles set out by the Canadian Supreme Court in Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 and R v Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442 (“the Dagenais/Mentuck test”), namely that a request for a publication ban may be ordered when: (a)   such an order is necessary in order to prevent a serious risk to the proper administration of justice because reasonably alternative measures… [read post]