Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 9,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) (20 December 2011), in the Technology and Construction court, an applicant successfully invoked her right to privacy under Article 8, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, and was granted an interim injunction to prevent transmission, storage and indexing of any part or parts of certain photographic images taken from the phone, and an anonymity order under CPR r.39.2(4), as explained by Rosalind English here. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:56 am
Indeed, Quarles v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm
” He relied on the English Court of Appeal decision in Adams v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
He asserted that Petrushova and her husband were working for Mukhtar Ablyazov, a Kazakh national who has been found by an English court to have defrauded a Kazakh bank of $4.6 billion. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
In Giraldo v Fernandez, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226159, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:51 am
See McCormick v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 2:39 am
Liquidated Damages v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:05 am
This very issue arose in R v Fraser (Fraser). [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
(I’m very pleased to welcome Antoine Dusséaux from Doctrine as a guest contributor on this post. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of either of the surrendering or the demanding country, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry')) The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others heard 10th November… [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 1:39 pm
That didn’t go over so well.SPOTLIGHT 🔦Peaceful assembly finally gets its dueHillier v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:32 pm
SpainGoogle v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
