Search for: "English v. English" Results 6541 - 6560 of 11,203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2013, 3:20 pm
, Mel Brooks Starts Nonprofit Foundation to Save Word 'Schmuck') Naturally, something this important must have a California appellate angle: Enter footnote 2 in People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:05 am by Afro Leo
What is generic in one country may not be known or a well known trade mark in another in another (Polo in the UK v Polo in RSA; Kettle in the USA v Kettle in Europe; Xerox in the US and Xerox is RSA etc). [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
ARTICLE V(1) Where either contracting State imposes the tax by reason of the nationality thereof or the domicile therein of a decedent or a donor or a beneficiary of a decedent's estate or of a gift, such State shallallow against its tax (computed without application of this Article) a credit for the tax imposed by the other contracting State with respect to property situated at the time of the transfer in such other State and included for the taxes of both States (but the amount of… [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm by Jon Sands
Prysock, 453 U.S. 355 (1981), and it didn't matter that the English warnings were OK.The decision is here:http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/07/15/12-30074.pdfUnited States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
My article, "The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Global Dimensions of Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity in Cuba" has just been published and will appear in Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 33:527-618 (2013). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am by Robert Brammer
Walter, and Elizabeth Fajans (2008) Plain English for Lawyers, by Richard C. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
According to the defendant here, since he was not conversant in English, the waiver he signed was ambiguous. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am by Dan Stein
Briefly: At this blog, Tom Goldstein provides a “plain English” summary of this past Term’s rulings on same-sex marriage, affirmative action (in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:02 pm by Stephen Bilkis
According to the defendant here, since he was not conversant in English, the waiver he signed was ambiguous. [read post]