Search for: "In Re: Michael"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 14,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2023, 11:10 pm
Michael le Belfrey York [2023] ECC Yor 2] [Video] [Top of section] [Top of post] Reordering and alternative uses Re St. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:30 am
Michael R. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:32 am
We’re finishing out my unofficial Con Artist History Month with a name with which many of you won’t be familiar, and a bad dude at that. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:16 am
(Eugene Volokh) The Ohio Supreme Court just held this yesterday in In re D.B.; it’s a very important decision, and since the court expressly rested its holding on its view of the U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 3:01 pm
Michael Risch, Functionality and Graphical User Interface Design Patents Commentator: Matthew Sag Sag: what are design patents? [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:46 am
We’re going back to the definition of used. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
Mashups, copyright and moral rights in Canada (IP Osgoode) Clement: No Copyright Bill until late 2009 at the earliest, Spring 2010 possible (Michael Geist) Government may be altering copyright submissions without consent (Michael Geist) Brad Fox on format shifting (Michael Geist) Collier-Brown on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Danielle Parr on anti-circumvention legislation (Michael Geist) Music Groups gearing up as part of copyright consultation… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am
s digital lock rules: no risk of liability for breaking locks (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 12: Canadian Association of Research Libraries (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 13: Canadian Historical Association (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 14: Canadian National Institute for the Blind (Michael Geist) The daily digital lock dissenter, day 15: Canadian Bookseller Association (Michael Geist)… [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 6:38 pm
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
He concluded, "You know, we're fucked. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 3:50 am
They’re not even pretending this is about Cohen. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
He concluded, "You know, we're fucked. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:24 pm
So we’re hoping we can discuss the points that Michael addresses in his paper and maybe it’ll be useful to some students or other lawyers out there, since this applies not only to new lawyers and students, but also to, you know, lawyers who have been practicing for some time. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:41 am
We’re not making any profit, and we’re working for the public good, so how could anyone possibly do it more cheaply than we? [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
FLO Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB Precedential No.9: ELECTRONIC CANDLE COMPANY generics for light bulbs: In re Wm. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
FLO Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB Precedential No.9: ELECTRONIC CANDLE COMPANY generics for light bulbs: In re Wm. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 6:21 am
This is NOT to say anyone should ever talk, but rather, if you’re reading this and it’s too late, then we’ll handle it. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 12:00 am
Re St. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 3:12 am
[Re St. [read post]
