Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 6541 - 6560 of 7,891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 7:53 pm by Tim Titolo
The basic questions concerning free will are (1) whether we are able to choose other than we actually do, (2) whether our choices are made intelligibly, and (3) whether we are really the originators of our choices. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:45 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
In three issues, Lindley contends that (1) FIA’s suit was improperly reinstated; (2) FIA failed to serve him with notice of trial settings; and (3) the default judgment is “defective. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Buce
H/T John for the pointer.Afterthought: I guess I'd agree that economists are special. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiff alleged claims for: (1) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, California Business & Professions Code § 17200 (“UCL”), (2) violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, California Civil Code § 1750 (“CLRA”), and (3) unjust enrichment. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:06 pm by Sheppard Mullin
When determining an appropriate damages award under Section 1117(c)(2), courts typically assess the same factors as when deciding an appropriate willful copyright infringement damages award: “(1) the expenses saved and the profits reaped; (2) the revenues lost by the plaintiff; (3) the value of the [trademark]; (4) the deterrent effect on others beside the defendant; (5) whether the defendant’s conduct was innocent or willful; (6) whether a defendant… [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am by Gerard Magliocca
Const., art I, § 3, cl. 1 (“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State . . . [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:27 pm by SOIssues
SORP applies to adult and juvenile sex offenders convicted or adjudicated on or after September 1, 1970 (an ex post facto law). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
(2) Does imposing failure-to-train liability on a district attorney’s office for a single Brady violation undermine prosecutors’ absolute immunity? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 1:53 pm by charonqc
Financial Times: Cameron targets non-Tory vote The FT does, indeed, cover this rather more sensibly than I do…. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence Solum
 Let me explain this in three steps: (1) the old view, (2) the new view, and (3) the relationship between the two [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 3:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Let's take a quick look at four rivals to Justice as Fairness: (1) utilitarianism, (2) egalitarianism (or "strict equality"), (3) desert, and (4) libertarianism. [read post]
  The Society believes that the model fits within an exemption that covers brokers’ and banks” efforts to obtain voting instructions from their clients, Rule 14a-2(a)(1). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:53 pm by Ashby Jones
This, plaintiffs contended, constituted a violation of the antitrust laws, namely Section 7 of the Clayton Act and Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:50 am by Broc Romanek
The SEC held a roundtable in February 2004, after which it received approximately 200 additional individually-signed comments, plus an additional 2,000 form letters. 2. 2007 proposal (alternative 1) - The SEC received approximately 200 comments on this alternative, plus 9,300 form letters. 3. 2007 proposal (alternative 2) - The SEC received approximately 600 comments on this alternative, plus 26,000 form letters. 4. 2009 proposal - The SEC has received… [read post]