Search for: "People v Word" Results 6541 - 6560 of 17,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2017, 3:23 am by Robin Shea
With President Trump in office for nine months now, it is hard to believe that none of his people are yet on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:02 pm
 We want people to have their claims heard on the merits, rather than dismissed for a legal reason that we got wrong, and denying res judicata to the second (totally identical) suit solves the problem. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 1:11 am by Jani Ihalainen
As to their visual similarity, the judge concluded that, as the trademark and the sign complained of share the same words in the same order, and while they are connected as one word, they are nonetheless separated by the capitalization of both words. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm by Érika Bergeron-Drolet
In other words, there is no statutory exception for works copied onto one’s skin as a tattoo. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm by Érika Bergeron-Drolet
In other words, there is no statutory exception for works copied onto one’s skin as a tattoo. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am by Steve Lubet
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
In other words, about a third more decision makers found the invention obvious when they were aware of it versus those who were only told of the problem, despite having been informed of the same prior art references. [read post]