Search for: "R. B."
Results 6541 - 6560
of 55,746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2018, 2:15 am
§ 315(b) because ION acted in privity with PGS, and over a year passed between its infringement complaint against ION and the PGS IPR petition. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:53 am
Brough v Law and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1183; [2011] WLR (D) 300 “A maintenance assessment under which an absent parent was liable to pay maintenance in respect of a qualifying child to the parent with care did not end as a result of a brief reconciliation between the parents within paragraph 16(1)(b) of Schedule 1 to the Child Support Act 1991 as read with section 3 of that Act.” WLR Daily, 20th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
24 May 2014, 10:07 am
As soon as the Law Office of Robert B. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
§§ 102 and 311(b). [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:14 am
Amy B. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Risky and uncertain privilege and work-product concerns arise when a company designates an in-house attorney to serve as a FRCP 30(b)(6) deposition witness. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 5:05 am
The Federal Circuit recently reversed the Western District of Washington’s dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure where the district court held that the claimed subject matter was ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:45 am
Mama Jo’s, Inc. d/b/a Berries, has now petitioned the U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:15 am
The USPTO recently revised Manual of Patent Examination Procedure (MPEP) Section 706.07(b) to retroactively impose a first action final rejection (FAFR) policy that significantly reduces patent applicants’ options (MPEP, E9R10.2019. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 7:39 pm
PLAN MAY NOT PROPOSE EARLY PAYOFF BUT 1329 MAY ALLOW POST CONFIRMATION MODIFICATION In re Kidd, et al, Case No. 06-41232 August 2007, Judge Karlin The Court recognized changes in 1324(b)(4) and held that debtors may not propose an early pay off but may obtain the same in the right circumstances via 1329. [read post]
12 May 2014, 11:51 am
The problem for DuPont was that the internal e-mails showed that in-house attorneys advised DuPont executives that the company did not have the right to commercialize the stacked product "[b]ecause of the field of use limitation" contained within the Licensing agreement. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board in B/E Aerospace v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 1:30 pm
B-2 955 190, upholding amended compound claims that include Gilead’s blockbuster hepatitis C drug, Sovaldi (sofosbuvir). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 4:30 am
§ 42.123(b). [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
First Protective Insurance Company d/b/a Frontline Insurance, out of Florida’s 2nd District Court of Appeal, cleared up some longstanding confusion as to what constitutes a “cure” of a civil remedy notice. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
” 37 C.F.R. 1.131(b). [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 2:52 pm
Located in a rural setting directly on the Louie B. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:13 am
Jeffrey B. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 1:35 pm
Trung Anh Le, 36, California, pleaded guilty to one count of pattern of mortgage lending fraud, a category “B” felony. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:44 am
The “right to be forgotten” was not created by the GDPR The GDPR replaced the EU’s 1995 Directive which provided in Article 12(b) that “Member States must guarantee every data subject the right to obtain from the controller: (…),… More [read post]