Search for: "R. MORALES"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 15,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2013, 8:20 am
It’s not the right choice for a tough leader or a moral leader. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:03 am
In Canada, a few historic judgments also may be said to fall within the “Hero” paradigm: the majority opinion in R. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 6:32 am
The book similarly tackles the looming prospect of autonomous drones and the many serious moral misgivings such a future portends. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 4:07 pm
In such cases, good morals and public policy dictate that not only should proponent be denied costs but that he be personally charged with discretionary costs for his unsuccessful effort as was ruled in the cases of Matter of Reeves, Matter of Godlef, Matter of Lachat and Matter of Jackson. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:52 pm
Preached a sermon, gave a speech, or otherwise expressed religious, political, or moral views condemning homosexuality. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:07 pm
Yes, It Already Did and It Depends”--Luis R. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 8:45 am
Saturday was date night, and Katrina and I went to the local over-the-top-luxurious movie theater, where you sit in recliners and swaddle yourself in soft blankets and order food and drink from the full menu to be brought to you in your seats.1 Now, if I am presented with an opportunity for someone to bring me Chimay whilst I recline and watch a movie, I view it as morally wrong to miss it. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 11:06 am
(Ilya Somin) Public choice economist Bruce Yandle famously developed the concept of a “baptist-bootlegger coalition” to describe situations in which regulation is supported by a strange bedfellow alliance of groups who favor it for narrowly self-interested reasons and those who support it out of moral or ideological considerations. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 1:17 am
Whilst, morally, they felt that the leaseholders should be right, the clauses were clear and it would be wrong to re-write the bargain.Two issues arise in the judgement. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 1:17 am
Whilst, morally, they felt that the leaseholders should be right, the clauses were clear and it would be wrong to re-write the bargain.Two issues arise in the judgement. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
” As I’ve discussed in earlier posts, there is an intriguing body of experimental research suggesting that we each have two distinct mental processes by which we reach moral judgments, one more harshly punitive and the other more nuanced and multidimensional. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:15 am
In the long term this will prove damaging to the national morale—what happens to a great nation when its people come to lack even rudimentary confidence in the decisions made by the revenue-gathering arm of its federal government? [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
In R. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 11:18 pm
But it’s probably a more sophisticated moral debate than meets the eye. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In this column, I argue that the Republicans are actually engaged in their cruel agenda because they reject hundreds of years of moral and intellectual progress, a set of ideas generally referred to as “the Enlightenment. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:14 pm
A finding of undue influence requires proof of "a moral coercion, which restrained independent action and destroyed free agency...". [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:24 am
The moral of the story, though, is that it’s the driver’s ultimate responsibility to ensure that he is paying attention to the road and not allowing himself to be distracted, whether by his hand-held device, or by what he can view or accomplish on his dashboard. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 10:18 pm
Today (July 22) is the feast day to celebrate the life and work of St. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
Whether or not Kilchermann is a "yellow journalist" in the sense of bias, her lawsuit marks her as a "yellow journalist" in the sense of despicable moral cowardice and betrayal of American values. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:25 am
This tort requires a plaintiff to show that (1) the wrongdoer acted intentionally or recklessly; (2) the conduct offended generally accepted standards of decency and morality and thus was outrageous and intolerable; (3) a causal connection existed between the wrongdoer's conduct and the victim's emotional distress and (4) the victim's emotional distress was severe. [read post]
